Tollestrup Law
All posts

personal-injury

Wrongful-Death Claims in California: Who Can File and What They Recover

February 13, 2026

When a family member's death is caused by another's negligence, the law allows certain surviving family members to bring a wrongful-death claim. The cause of action is statutory in California, with a specific list of who may sue and a specific framework for what is recoverable. The rules are not intuitive, and small errors at the front end of a wrongful-death case can produce significant problems later.

This post is a short walkthrough of who can sue, what they can recover, and how the claim relates to the deceased person's own claim (the survival action).

Two distinct claims

Two different claims can arise when a person dies from injuries caused by another's negligence:

  • A wrongful-death claim under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 377.60. This is brought by surviving family members in their own right and seeks damages for their loss — the loss of the relationship, of financial support, of household services.
  • A survival action under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 377.30 and § 377.34. This is brought by the personal representative of the decedent's estate and seeks damages the decedent could have recovered if they had lived to bring their own case — generally limited (after January 1, 2026) to economic damages such as medical bills and lost income, plus, in rare cases, punitive damages.

Both claims often arise from the same underlying death, are litigated together, and are evaluated under different rules. The 2022–2025 expansion of the survival action — which temporarily allowed pain-and-suffering damages — was discussed in an earlier post; the wrongful-death framework discussed here is unaffected by that sunset.

Who can sue

Code of Civil Procedure § 377.60 sets out, in order, the categories of people who may bring a wrongful-death action:

  • The decedent's surviving spouse, domestic partner, children, and issue of deceased children. If none of these survive, then:
  • Other persons who would be entitled to the decedent's property by intestate succession — typically parents, then siblings, then more distant relatives under California's intestate-succession framework.
  • The decedent's putative spouse, children of a putative spouse, stepchildren, parents, or legal guardians of the decedent, if any of these were dependent on the decedent for at least one-half of their support.
  • A minor who lived in the decedent's household for at least 180 days before the death and was dependent on the decedent for at least one-half of their support.

The list is statutory and exclusive. People with significant emotional connection to the decedent — siblings of an adult decedent who do not qualify under intestate succession, close friends, unmarried partners who are not registered domestic partners — generally do not have wrongful-death standing under California law.

Whether a particular family member qualifies is sometimes a non-trivial analysis. Putative-spouse status, dependent-stepchild status, and similar fact-specific categories require evaluation early.

What they can recover

Wrongful-death damages in California fall into two categories:

Pecuniary (economic) damages. These include:

  • Loss of financial support the decedent would have provided to the surviving family member, including future support discounted to present value
  • Loss of household services the decedent provided (childcare, home maintenance, food preparation, similar contributions)
  • Funeral and burial expenses of the decedent

Non-pecuniary (non-economic) damages. California recognizes recovery for the loss of the decedent's:

  • Love, companionship, comfort, care, assistance, protection, affection, society, and moral support
  • Training and guidance that the decedent would have provided (particularly relevant for surviving children)

California does not allow wrongful-death recovery for:

  • The survivors' own grief or sorrow
  • The survivors' own emotional distress, separate from the loss-of-relationship element
  • Punitive damages on the wrongful-death claim itself (though punitive damages may be recoverable on a parallel survival claim under specific exceptions)

The non-economic component of wrongful-death damages can be substantial in cases involving close family relationships and significant emotional contribution. The framework is fact-driven, supported by family-member testimony and the documentation of the relationship.

"Heirs" and the single-action rule

Wrongful-death claims under California law are subject to a single-action rule. All eligible heirs must join in a single action — they cannot bring separate, parallel suits. The personal representative of the decedent's estate can bring the wrongful-death action on behalf of all qualifying heirs, or one or more heirs can bring it on behalf of all.

The single-action rule has practical consequences:

  • Heirs need to coordinate at the front end — even when the relationships among them are difficult.
  • An heir who declines to participate in the action does not generally lose their share of any eventual recovery, but they should be served with notice and given the opportunity to be heard.
  • Failure to include all qualifying heirs can produce procedural problems that surface later.

Statute of limitations

Wrongful-death claims in California are generally subject to a two-year statute of limitations under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1, measured from the date of death. The clock does not run from the date of the underlying injury — if the decedent lived for some period after the injury, the wrongful-death clock starts when they died, not when they were initially harmed.

Government-entity defendants are subject to the six-month government-claims deadline, which runs from the date of death (or, in some configurations, from accrual of the claim).

Common patterns the firm sees

Three patterns worth noting:

1. Out-of-state heirs. Many California wrongful-death cases involve heirs who live elsewhere. Coordinating across state lines — for documentation, depositions, and ultimately settlement decisions — is part of the work.

2. Adult children of a decedent without a surviving spouse. This category often produces a wrongful-death action that is straightforward in standing but more difficult in damages valuation, particularly where the adult children were not financially dependent on the decedent. Loss of guidance, society, and companionship can still produce meaningful damages, even where economic dependency was minimal.

3. Pre-existing family disputes. Wrongful death sometimes brings out unresolved family tensions — stepchildren and biological children, ex-spouses and current spouses, and so on. The single-action rule means these tensions have to be navigated within a single procedural framework. Counsel familiar with the dynamics is part of the work.

When to call

For families dealing with a recent death of a loved one in California, the legal questions can wait — but not for long. The two-year statute and the six-month government-claims deadline both run on a fixed clock that does not pause for grief.

If you are in this situation, please contact the firm when you are ready. Initial consultations are at no cost.

This article is general information and not legal advice. Wrongful-death law involves specific statutory categories and damages frameworks; specific situations need specific review with current authority.